Board Minutes November 2012: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Document Storage Policy: Section 1C
(→Document Storage Policy: Section 1C) |
|||
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
* [[Document Storage Policy]] | * [[Document Storage Policy]] | ||
* Section 1a appears to have a typo: "There must be a reasonable assumption that the service provider will not <strike>be </strike>lose the documents or discontinue service in the foreseeable future." | * Section 1a appears to have a typo: "There must be a reasonable assumption that the service provider will not <strike>be </strike>lose the documents or discontinue service in the foreseeable future." | ||
* Google does not guarantee compliance with section 1c: "Documents should be accessible by each of the board members." Since the software is stored server side, and is often changed without notice. Even if notice is given, it is often impossible to opt out or roll back from the change. | |||
* Section 3 is not clear if a physical location must be known, or it a Uniform Resource Indicator is sufficient to disclose the location. | * Section 3 is not clear if a physical location must be known, or it a Uniform Resource Indicator is sufficient to disclose the location. | ||
* James Phillips is uneasy with our apparent new reliance on Google. In particular, it appears that the Corporate Google accounts are being used as a form of Information Rights Management, which can never work since that would violate the law of cause and effect. | * James Phillips is uneasy with our apparent new reliance on Google. In particular, it appears that the Corporate Google accounts are being used as a form of Information Rights Management, which can never work since that would violate the law of cause and effect. | ||