Staff Performance Review Policy

Revision as of 13:33, 28 March 2013 by Adam.burgess (talk | contribs)

Policy Statement

Purpose of the policy

To ensure that a review of the Executive Director's performance happens regularly.

Philosophy

"Some boards neglect their duty of evaluating the director. They may fear conflict, be at a loss for the tools, or lack the tradition. All are poor, if common, reasons to avoid evaluation. That’s too bad, because evaluation offers numerous benefits, including:

  • Ensuring that the board is meeting its duty to actively lead the organization
  • Monitoring whether organizational goals are being achieved
  • Providing an opportunity to set new annual goals
  • Maintaining a formal, documented, fair, and pragmatic process for providing

feedback to the executive

  • Helping the executive understand the board’s perspective on his or her

strengths and limitations

  • Providing direction for specific improvements in skills and performance
  • Providing documented processes that help the board retain, improve, or retire the

executive, as well as justify changes in compensation and other matters of record

  • Maintaining a process and documentation that can help protect the board if they

let a chief executive go and the chief executive decides to sue the organization

  • Helping board members examine the executive’s accomplishments rather than

personality

  • Laying the foundation for an improved working relationship between board

and executive

  • Identifying opportunities, strengths, challenges, and strategic questions before

they become troubling issues." Source (pdf)


Definitions of key concepts or terms used in the policy

Scope

Permissible Exceptions

Positions in the organization responsible for implementing and monitoring the policy

Dates of Effect

Date Approved, Revisioned and Active

Enter Date Information

Date Expired

Enter Date Information