Staff Performance Review Policy
Policy Statement
Purpose of the policy
To ensure that a review of the Executive Director's performance happens regularly.
Philosophy
"Some boards neglect their duty of evaluating the director. They may fear conflict, be at a loss for the tools, or lack the tradition. All are poor, if common, reasons to avoid evaluation. That’s too bad, because evaluation offers numerous benefits, including:
- Ensuring that the board is meeting its duty to actively lead the organization
- Monitoring whether organizational goals are being achieved
- Providing an opportunity to set new annual goals
- Maintaining a formal, documented, fair, and pragmatic process for providing
feedback to the executive
- Helping the executive understand the board’s perspective on his or her
strengths and limitations
- Providing direction for specific improvements in skills and performance
- Providing documented processes that help the board retain, improve, or retire the
executive, as well as justify changes in compensation and other matters of record
- Maintaining a process and documentation that can help protect the board if they
let a chief executive go and the chief executive decides to sue the organization
- Helping board members examine the executive’s accomplishments rather than
personality
- Laying the foundation for an improved working relationship between board
and executive
- Identifying opportunities, strengths, challenges, and strategic questions before
they become troubling issues." Source (pdf)
Definitions of key concepts or terms used in the policy
Scope
Permissible Exceptions
Positions in the organization responsible for implementing and monitoring the policy
Dates of Effect
|
|