Board Minutes August 2012
These minutes are not yet approved.
EBC Board Meeting Minutes for August 16, 2012
- Time: 6:30pm
- Location: LAW 101
- Food: Bernadette
Call to order
18.45
- In attendance: Adam, Neil, Steph, Micah, Alex C., Paul, Bernadette, Duncan, James, Chris Chan, Chris Corrigan.
- Regrets: Brett, Lee
- Absent: none
- Guests: none
- Chair: Bernadette
- Minute-taker: Micah
Approval of agenda
- Steph: I move to approve. Seconded by Adam. Carried.
Approval of minutes
- Adam edited July minutes 'for tone'.
- Steph: I move to Approve. Seconded by Adam. Carried.
Next meeting
- Date: 12 September @ 18.30.
- Location: Micah will attempt to book Law 101 once more.
- Food: Paul
Reports
President's Report
None this month.
Treasurer's Report
Currently sitting on a $17,000 loss, though several grants will be recognised in August, as we'll bill the Police for Spoke-related reno costs, receive funding from MEC for the rental program and file the reimbursement request for STEP funding towards Justin's wages. Still expect a year end loss of approximately $8k. Have spent $15k this year renovating the North Shop. We need to stop now and work with it as is.
We discussed briefly.
Executive Director's Report
Executive Director Report - August 16, 2012
We ran through Chris' report.
BikeWorks Report
BikeWorks Director Report - August 7, 2012
Summer Coordinator Report - August 10, 2012
Committee Report
Old business
Action Items from Last Meeting
Carried forward from earlier meetings
- re: Stollery grant: new action item: produce new invoice: Neil and Paul.
- re: Nigerian Ass'n: continuous attempts at communication
- re: fence: assigned to Justin
New action items from last meeting
- for all: Review Bern's notes: Board Development Workshop
- action item (for all): Recruit!
New business
WCB Pricing Question
- We have been asked to vote on a question regarding the way our WCB account is priced. Our vote affects the whole industry group (community service organizations). Out of some 6 pages of information from WCB, the bottom line seems to be that we'll save around $0.02 per $100 of payroll (maybe $20-$30 year), by moving costs related "longer recovery due to pre-existing condition" out of the industry cost pool an onto individual employers that run into this kind of workplace injury. How does the board want us to vote?
- Neil - I'm bringing this up because the best interests of EBC seems to be "yes," though marginal, but I'm concerned about that other employers in our group who aggressively manage their WCB costs might start screening applicants for potentially expensive pre-existing conditions, so if it were up to me I'd be voting against EBC's financial interests, and felt I should clear this by the board. I suspect it'll pass regardless of how we vote.
Reviewing the need for formal position statements
- from the most recent newsletter:
"One of the big takeaways was this: in cities throughout Canada, the United States, Australia, and the world, at all stages of bike infrastructure (from almost nothing in American cities to European cities with established cycle paths), there has been a move away from painted bike lanes as ineffective, instead favouring separated cycle tracks (like in Ottawa, Montreal, New York City, and Vancouver), for arterials, and bike boulevards and neighbourhood greenways for lower-traffic roads.
It's what's needed to make the 60% of "interested, but concerned" potential cyclists feel safe enough to ride on the road. Would you be comfortable with a child or a grandmother riding down Edmonton's streets? If not, then are we only building bike lanes for people who will ride anyway?"
-I don't necessarily have a problem with this idea, but do we need a broader discussion (within the board, advocacy committee, or members) before something becomes a de facto position of EBC? -Adam
2013 Budget
Our financial year ends at the end of August, and we need to establish a budget for 2013. Neil has put together a starting point which includes a planned loss of $20,000, after a loss in the $8k range during 2012 (Based on preliminary estimates for August). While we have reserves to cover this kind of loss in the short term, it isn't a good plan, and takes us below a prudent reserve level. Action should be taken to increase revenue or cut expenses in some way.
Raising revenue is generally the path of least resistance, as the deficiency could be covered by one or receiving just one or two grants, depending on size. Much of the expenses are salaries and rent, which - while not entirely immovable - would be a major change of direction to cut.
The 2014 casino is scheduled for the 3rd quarter, a full two years from the last one, so casino revenue must be stretched over a longer time period than previously.
AGM planning
- where
- when
- how to be publicized
- who to lead
- what's on the agenda
- food
- what info to ask potential board members for, and how to make that visible in advance to members